Legal Opinion

Branden Hargrove v. Fred Anderson Toyota of Sanford and Regional Acceptance Corporation

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided June 11, 2026No. 5:25-cv-00322Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:25-CV-322-BO-KS BRANDEN HARGROVE, ) Plaintiff, v. ORDER FRED ANDERSON TOYOTA OF SANFORD and REGIONAL ) ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, ) Defendants. This cause comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss and a motion to dismiss and compel arbitration filed by defendants, [DE 28]; [DE 32], plaintiff's motions to strike and motion for entry of default [DE 21]; [DE 22] [DE 38], and defendant Fred Anderson Toyota’s motion for extension of time. [DE 20]. The appropriate responses and replies have been…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Smith v. SpizzirriSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  4. Poor v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Adkins v. Labor Ready, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API