Admasu v. Port of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
11 A group of property owners seek compensation for the diminished value of their properties *28due to the Port of Seattle’s (Port) operation of the third runway at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac Airport).1 The property owners appeal from the trial court’s order denying class certification and two orders granting summary judgment in favor of the Port. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying class certification because the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that common issues would predominate over individual issues and that a class action was a superior method of…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Admasu v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Admasu v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Bellevue Farms,et Al., Appellants/cross-respondents v. Chad Stevens, Respondent/cross-appellantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Carmelo Zappala & Cheryl Zappala, Apps v. The Port Of Seattle, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Chad Stevens v. Bellevue Farm Owner's AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.