Legal Opinion

Carmelo Zappala & Cheryl Zappala, Apps v. The Port Of Seattle, Resp

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 18, 2020No. 79271-7Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CARMELO ZAPPALA and CHERYL ZAPPALA, husband and wife, No. 79271-7-I Appellants, DIVISION ONE v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION THE PORT OF SEATTLE, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondent. FILED: February 18, 2020 APPELWICK, C.J. — The Zappalas appeal an order of summary judgment rejecting their inverse condemnation claim against the Port for excessive airplane noise. They contend the avigation easement they granted to the Port is not enforceable by reason of procedural unconscionability. We affirm. FACTS Carmelo and Cheryl Zappala have owned a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keck v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Martin v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Hite v. Public Utility District No. 2Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State ex rel. American Freehold-Land Mortgage Co. of London v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API