Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1950No. Appeals, Nos. 111 and 179PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Horace Stern,

Through the machinations of one Bennewitt and the negligence of a notary public the use plaintiff, Willow Highlands Company, suffered a loss by the disbursement of its money on a forged mortgage. It instituted the present action against the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, the surety on the notary’s bond.*

Bennewitt purporting to represent Charles and Kaethe Bose, owners of premises 5534 North 7th Street, Philadelphia, made application on their behalf to the use plaintiff for a mortgage loan in the amount of $8,500 to be secured by a first lien upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. Cheltenham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Shay v. SchrinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Commonwealth v. DoakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RootSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Immerman v. OstertagNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  3. Commonwealth v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Thomas v. State Ex Rel. Thorp Finance Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Dean v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API