Commonwealth v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Horace Stern,
Through the machinations of one Bennewitt and the negligence of a notary public the use plaintiff, Willow Highlands Company, suffered a loss by the disbursement of its money on a forged mortgage. It instituted the present action against the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, the surety on the notary’s bond.*
Bennewitt purporting to represent Charles and Kaethe Bose, owners of premises 5534 North 7th Street, Philadelphia, made application on their behalf to the use plaintiff for a mortgage loan in the amount of $8,500 to be secured by a first lien upon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. Cheltenham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Shay v. SchrinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. DoakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RootSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Immerman v. OstertagNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Commonwealth v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Thomas v. State Ex Rel. Thorp Finance Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1965
- Dean v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.