Legal Opinion
Immerman v. Ostertag
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 23, 1964PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
83 N.J. Super. 364 (1964)
199 A.2d 869
RUTH IMMERMAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERT F. OSTERTAG, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided April 23, 1964.
Mr. Sanford Halberstadter, attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Abraham H. Sles, attorney for defendant.
WM. FILLMORE WOOD, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
This is a suit by a mortgagee against a notary public for alleged negligence and false representations in connection with the execution of mortgage papers, namely, the mortgage, bond and affidavit of title.
The significant facts are not in substantial dispute. Plaintiff agreed to lend the sum of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kulas v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Hamilton v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Commonwealth v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Commonwealth v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Smiley v. HannaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Villanueva v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- RJ Longo Const. Co. v. SchraggerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.