Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Doak

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1945No. Appeals, 70 and 71PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This is an appeal by the use-plaintiff from the entry of judgments n. o. v. in her suit against the defendant, Doak, a notary public, and against the surety on his official bond, to recover the $4,000 expended by her in reliance on the defendant notary’s false certificate of acknowledgment of a mortgage. Defendants put in no testimony. The arguments of the parties have reduced the question for decision to whether there is evidence supporting the jury’s finding that plaintiff’s money was paid in reliance on the genuineness of the false certificate. Since plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gunster v. Scranton Illuminating, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Boyle v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. BoggsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. State ex rel. Koste v. Maryland Casualty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Nahrgang v. American Employers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API