Legal Opinion
Secard Pools, Inc. v. Kinsale Ins. Co.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 28, 2017No. Case No.: 5:16-cv-02404-JFWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John F. Walter, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an insurance coverage dispute filed by Secard Pools, Inc. and its key officers, Joe and Edmond Secard ("SECARD PARTIES") against Kinsale Insurance Company ("KINSALE") arising from KINSALE's denial of coverage for a suit by Solar Sun Rings ("SSR") alleging Claims For Relief for trademark and trade dress infringement, false designation of origin, false advertising and unfair competition under Federal and California law (the "SSR Action"). Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint against KINSALE ("FAC") (Dkt. 1-4) asserts claims for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Acceptance Insurance v. Syufy EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. v. Robert BandariDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Barbizon School of San Francisco, Inc. INC. v. Sentinel Insurance Company LtdDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- French Laundry Partners, LP dba The French Laundry v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Garnicas Transport LLC v. Commercial Alliance Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- SWEETBERRY HOLDINGS LLC v. THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021