Dill v. Lawrence
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The appellants charged one of the jurors who tried the case with misconduct, and filed affidavits in support of their charge. Counter affidavits were filed by the appellee, and the issue of fact thus presented was decided adversely to the appellants.
A settled rule forbids us to disturb that decision. Doles v.State, 97 Ind. 555, and cases cited; Luck v. State, 96 Ind. *56516; Shields v. State, 95 Ind. 299; Catterlin v. City of Frankfort, 87 Ind. 45; Elliott v. State, 73 Ind. 10.
The complaint is on a bond executed by the appellants to secure the performance of work undertaken by one of them, Jacob…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Catterlin v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Doles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Carpenter v. LockhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
- Elliott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Luck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Salem v. AnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Stevens v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Cabinet Makers' Union v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Tudor v. BeathIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.