Legal Opinion

Tudor v. Beath

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1921No. 10,774PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Blackford Circuit Court; Frank W. Gordon, Judge. Action by John Beath against John B. Tudor. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals..

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Complaint by appellee in two paragraphs for damages by reason of an alleged breach of a contract for the sale and exchange of certain real estate. Appellee in each paragraph of complaint seeks to recover as liquidated damages the amount named in the contract. Neither paragraph can be construed as a complaint for actual damages.

Both paragraphs are in substance the same, and allege that the parties entered into a contract whereby appellant agreed to sell and convey a 120-acre farm to appellee for $13,200, appellant to accept a certain lot in Hartford City in lieu of $1,200 cash, the remaining…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Guerin v. StacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Keck v. BieberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Watt's Ex'rs. v. SheppardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rogers v. LockardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Beiser v. KerrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Mandle v. OwensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Zalewski v. SimpsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API