Legal Opinion

Waller v. Rothfield

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 15, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, second district, borough of Manhattan. As to the certificate of authority of a foreign corporation see L. 1892, ch. 687, § 15; as to license tax, L. 1896, ch. 908, § 181.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.

This action was brought by an assignee to recover the purchase price of a quantity of morocco which the Wheeler Stenzel Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Massachusetts, had sold through the agency of Hiclcok & Pate, of the city of Hew York, and which was shipped from Boston, Mass., direct to the defendant here.

The only question raised by the appellant herein is that the Massachusetts corporation, not having taken out a certificate or paid the tax required to be paid by a foreign corporation before doing business in this State, could not bring an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. National Knitting Co. v. BronnerNew York Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mendell v. WillyoungNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Mendell v. WillyoungAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
  3. A. H. Freiberg & Co. v. CheselingAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API