Legal Opinion

National Knitting Co. v. Bronner

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Motion to strike out answer as frivolous and for judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtHiscock, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff which is a • foreign corporation- organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin and having its place of business therein, to recover the sum of $1,502.65, upon the ground that “ plaintiff sold and delivered to said defendants goods, wares and merchandise at their special instance and request and upon their promise to pay plaintiff therefor, to the amount and of the value of $1,502.65, no part of which has been paid, etc.”

•. The answer in question sets up the fact that plaintiff is a foreign corporation as above stated; that it made the contract for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Tallapoosa Lumber Co. v. HolbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vaughn Machine Co. v. LighthouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Fuller v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Stafford-Higgins Industries, Inc. v. Gaytone Fabrics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  4. New York Architectural Terra-Cotta Co. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Jones v. KeelerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API