Legal Opinion
Mendell v. Willyoung
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, second district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.
The advertising solicitor of the plaintiff’s assignor obtained the defendant’s signature to a printed instrument of which the following is a copy.
“ Hew York, December 30th, 1901.
“ Electrician Publishing Company, Chicago:
“ In consideration of the rate at which this contract is made, you are hereby authorized to insert my advertisement to occupy a space of inches beginning with issue of January 4th, 1902, and in all alternate issues of the Western Electrician for 26 insertions, for which I agree to pay $5.08 per insertion, payable monthly.
“ When no other copy is provided repeat the last…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dillon v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Clark v. MarsigliaCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- White v. . CorliesNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Cummer Lumber Co. v. Associated Manufacturers' Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Goodwin v. KirkerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1859
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Estate of LarneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- J. K. Rishel Furniture Co. v. Stuyvesant Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1924
- Post v. Albert Frank & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
- Hollidge v. Gussow, Kahn & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
- Ernst v. Cary Safe Co.New York Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.