State v. Manzella
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentYoung, J.
I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the state produced sufficient “other proof’ to corroborate defendant’s confession or to prove the corpus delicti.
The record in this case is sparse. A police officer was called to the scene of an accident. When he arrived there were no cars in the street. There were some cars parked in a parking lot next to the street. Defendant was in the parking lot. He told the officer that his car was a 1976 Toyota two-door sedan and that he had stopped to make a left turn when his car was hit from behind. In response to the officer’s questions, defendant said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. LerchOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.