Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Manzella

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 12, 1987No. 60647; CA A43306Published

1DissentYoung, J.

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the state produced sufficient “other proof’ to corroborate defendant’s confession or to prove the corpus delicti.

The record in this case is sparse. A police officer was called to the scene of an accident. When he arrived there were no cars in the street. There were some cars parked in a parking lot next to the street. Defendant was in the parking lot. He told the officer that his car was a 1976 Toyota two-door sedan and that he had stopped to make a left turn when his car was hit from behind. In response to the officer’s questions, defendant said…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State v. LerchOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API