Legal Opinion

In re Fee Agreement of Carpenter

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided March 13, 2000No. 97-676PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLD AWAY, Judge:

The appellant, Kenneth M. Carpenter, Esquire, appeals the February 1997 decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) which determined that he was not eligible to charge a fee for service before the Secretary and the Board on behalf of veteran Onzie L. Wilkins, Jr. On October 15, 1999, the Court issued a single-judge memorandum decision affirming the decision of the Board, and the appellant filed a timely motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative, a panel decision. The Court has determined that the instant decision will clarify the law in the area of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frankel v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. In the Matter of the Fee Agreement of Bruce Tyler Wick. Bruce Tyler Wick, Movant-Appellee v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. In re the Fee Agreement of SmithUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  4. Isenbart v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  5. Smallwood v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stanley v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
  2. Carpenter v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
  3. Stanley v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API