Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Carpenter v. Gober

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided August 22, 2000No. 97-676Published

1ConcurrenceSteinberg, Judge

I voted to deny the appellant’s motion for a full Court decision in this case because such a decision is not necessary to maintain the uniformity of the Court’s caselaw and the issues involved are not of exceptional importance. I write separately, however, to point out three matters of concern to me, although these matters, in my view, do not, singly or in combination, justify a vote for a full Court decision.

First, a single-judge concurrence is not equivalent to a reasoned disposition by the Court of concerns raised as major arguments by an appellant. In light of the recent opinion of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richard A. Linville, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. In re Fee Agreement of MasonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
  3. In re Fee Agreement of CarpenterUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API