Legal Opinion

Cox v. Allen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 26, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Hon. E. L. Burton, Judge. Action for the recovery of specific personal property and damage for its detention. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The plaintiff was a resident of this state in the year 1890. In July of that year, he went to the state of Missouri, where he lived until June, 1891. On the second day of that month, he left Missouri and returned to Ottumwa, about noon of June sixth, and at 10 o’clock in the evening of the same day, the property in controversy, consisting of a team of horses, a harness, and wagon, was seized under a *464writ of attachment issued from justice’s court, in an action in which the defendant in this case was plaintiff and the plaintiff in this case was defendant. The action was founded on an account…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McLaren v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Hinds v. HindsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
  3. Rausch v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. Lease v. FranklinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  5. Pellersells v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barth v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Franke v. KelsheimerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Bell v. Courteen Seed Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Union County Investment Co. v. MessixSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Blakeslee v. PaulSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API