Union County Investment Co. v. Messix
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Plymouth District Court. — Hon. Wm. Hutchinson, Judge. Abpeal from an order overruling defendant’s motion to discharge an attachment and release a garnishment had under the attachment.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
On March 7, 1910, plaintiff brought action in the district court of Plymouth county against the defendant and her husband, M. V. Messix, to recover a balance claimed to be due for merchandise sold and 'delivered to the defendants. Upon an allegation that defendants weie nonresidents of the state, a writ of attachment issued on the same day, which was immediately served by garnishing the Akron Savings Bank and E. H. Youngstrom, cashier. In the notice of garnishment the garnishees were required to answer at the coming April, 191 — , term of court. No notice of the action was served upon either…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McLaren v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Padden v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Schaller & Son v. MarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Mudge v. LanningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Phillips v. GermonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Millsap v. FaulkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Franke v. KelsheimerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Bell v. Courteen Seed Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Blakeslee v. PaulSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Hubbard v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.