Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 16, 2009No. 78, September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

In this case we are asked to apply revisions enacted in 2008 to Maryland Code (2001, 2006 Cum.Supp.), Section 8-201 of the Criminal Procedure Article (CP), granting expanded remedies to certain convicted persons based on DNA evidence. We must decide whether to apply the 2008 revisions to this case, even though it was decided by the postconviction court, and appealed to this Court, before the January 1, 2009 effective date of the new law. We shall hold that the 2008 revisions apply to this case, meaning that Petitioner has a direct right of appeal to this Court, and that, as we vacate the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. State v. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Arrington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. Motor Vehicle Administration v. SheaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API