Legal Opinion

Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co. v. McNulty

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Allen Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

This was a suit by McNulty against the railway company for work and labor.

The company answered, first, the general denial; second, *532that they had been garnished, at the suit of one John'Harris, before a justice of the peace, at Toledo, in the State of Ohio, and adjudged to pay a part of the amount which had been due to the plaintiff in this suit, in payment of a claim of said Harris. They make the proceedings before the justice of the peace oj Toledo, and certain sections of the statutes of Ohio on the subject, part of the second paragraph of their answer. The company offered to confess…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Willey v. StricklandIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Cone v. CottonIndiana Supreme Court · 1827
  3. Ringle v. WestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Emery v. RoyalIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Newman v. ManningIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. AlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Treharne v. MatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Baker v. FlintIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API