Cone v. Cotton
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Shelby Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
Debt on a judgment of a justice of the peace of the state of Ohio. The plaintiff made profert of an authenticated transcript of said judgment. The defendants craved oyer of the transcript which was granted. And in this, it is said by the plaintiff that the Circuit Court erred. But it should be remembered, that, although oyer of a record is not properly dcmandable, yet, if profert is made, and oyer granted, no error is committed. So as it respects the transcript of this *83judgment. It is not a record; but as both parties have treated it as a record, we see no reason that either has to complain;…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bissell v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crake v. CrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Doe on the demise of Mitchell v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co. v. McNultyIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Warren Manuf'g Co. v. Etna Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1875
- Treharne v. MatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.