United States v. Carr
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge
The importations involved in this case came from Canada, and were entered for duty at the port of Detroit. The appraiser described the merchandise as automobile bodies; duty was assessed accordingly at the rate of 45 per cent ad valorem under the eo nomine provision for automobile bodies contained in paragraph 119 of the tariff act of 1913.
The importer protested against the assessment, claiming that the imported articles were not actually automobile bodies, but only skeletons or frames for such bodies, and that these were designed to be advanced after importation to the condition of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Athenia Steel & Wire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Fenton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. MerckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
- In re BlumenthalU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- Swank, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- United States v. Bata Shoe Co.United States Customs Court · 1939