Legal Opinion

Swank, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 12, 1951No. 55650; protests 147169-K and 147182-K (New York)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

Provision is made in the modification of paragraph 1531 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 1531) by the British Trade Agreement, T. D. 49753, for—

Belts and buckles designed to be worn on the person

at the rate of 17K per centum ad valorem, and for—

Other articles

*455at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem. The merchandise the subject of these protests, which were consolidated for trial and disposition, was entered and is claimed to be properly dutiable under the above provision for belts, but was classified by the collector and assessed with duty under the provision…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. United States v. CarrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  4. United States v. Bata Shoe Co.United States Customs Court · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hudson Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Reynolds Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API