Legal Opinion

Tate v. Mauldin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 14, 1930No. 12959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Brease.

The respondent in this case alleged, and he offered testimony to sustain the allegations of his complaint, material matters to the following effect: That the appellant, engaged in the business of bottling and placing on the market coca-cola and other bottled beverages, advertised and held out to the public generally, and to the respondent, that his bottled drinks were pure, wholesome, delicious, and refreshing; the respondent for some time had been in the habit of drinking the bottled beverages prepared and put on the market by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crigger v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Brown v. MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Minutilla v. Providence Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
  4. Bradfield v. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Honea v. PriorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API