Legal Opinion

Bradfield v. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1920No. 10346PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action for damages; from Fulton superior court—Judge Bell. January 11, 1919. Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

The plaintiff sued for damages, alleging that she had sustained injury by swallowing small particles of glass contained in a bottle of coca-cola put up and sold by the defendant, the Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Company. The defendant proved that it bottled the coca-cola with the latest and most improved machinery, and that most careful inspection was had and made of every bottle of coca-cola sold by it. The evidence was to the effect that the defendant sold the bottle of coca-cola to one person, who in turn sold it to the retail dealer, who in turn sold it to the plaintiff. The evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Watson v. Augusta Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Blood Balm Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Goldman & Freiman Bottling Co. v. SindellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  2. Revlon, Inc. v. Mrs. R. H. BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Armour & Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. McPherson v. Capuano & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. ShippCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API