Legal Opinion

United States v. Southern Pacific Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 16, 1962No. Civ. 40665PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLENBERG, District Judge.

The government seeks to recover fire suppression costs and damages because of the alleged negligence of the defendant, Southern Pacific Co., on July 8, 1957. Defendant has filed a counter claim for its fire suppression costs alleging wrongful and negligent acts of the government on the same day, July 8, 1957, involving the same fire.

The government seeks to dismiss the counter claim on the grounds:

1. That the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346, et seq., does not allow counter claims, but only actions originally instituted by private parties; and

2. That because…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blusal Meats, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor v. Lodge 851, International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1972
  4. Pittman v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1962
  5. United States v. HolderDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API