Legal Opinion

Melson v. Kroger Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 4, 1983No. C-3-82-061PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING - IN PART, AND OVERRULING IN PART, DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; FURTHER PROCEDURES SET

RICE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this civil rights action against various Defendants, alleging that their constitutional rights had been violated as a result of a warrantless search of their persons (and other actions) by at least two City of Dayton police officers, near the parking lot of a Kroger Company store. In a prior decision, published at 550 F.Supp. 1100 (S.D.Ohio 1982), this Court sustained in part, and overruled in part, Defendants’ motions to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coverdell v. Department Of Social And Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Coverdell v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Hoffman v. McNamaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
  4. Fishman v. De MeoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Bryant-Bruce v. Vanderbilt University, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API