Melson v. Kroger Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING - IN PART, AND OVERRULING IN PART, DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; FURTHER PROCEDURES SET
RICE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this civil rights action against various Defendants, alleging that their constitutional rights had been violated as a result of a warrantless search of their persons (and other actions) by at least two City of Dayton police officers, near the parking lot of a Kroger Company store. In a prior decision, published at 550 F.Supp. 1100 (S.D.Ohio 1982), this Court sustained in part, and overruled in part, Defendants’ motions to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coverdell v. Department Of Social And Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Coverdell v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Hoffman v. McNamaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
- Fishman v. De MeoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Bryant-Bruce v. Vanderbilt University, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.