Legal Opinion

Hart-Anderson v. Hauck

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1989No. 89-115PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

This is an appeal from an order by the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County, granting a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals. We reverse.

The issues presented for óur review are:

1. Did the District Court err in granting a directed verdict?

2. Did the District Court err in excluding certain hearsay evidence?

3. Did the District Court err in allowing a police officer to testify as to the cause of the accident?

4. Did the District Court err in excluding testimony regarding a traffic citation?

I

The present case involves a traffic accident and issues of negligence. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mydlarz v. Palmer/Duncan Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Reed v. LittleMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Goodnough v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hart-Anderson v. HauckMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Foreman v. MinnieMontana Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Peterson v. EichhornMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ryan v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Christofferson v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hislop v. CadyMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Perdue v. Gagnon Farms, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API