Legal Opinion

Crouch v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1924No. 3963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

The defendant, with a confederate, was engaged in operating what is known as a “banking crap game.” They pasted together genuine Federal Reserve notes of different denominations. For example, they would paste a $20 note and a $5 note, so that, looked at from one side, it appeared to be a $5 bill, while, looked at from the other side, it appeared to be a $20 bill. Similarly they pasted together $50 and $10 notes. The alleged practice was for the defendant to secure a victim and to act as his banker, handling his money, while the confederate would make a bet, placing on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. JanowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. SacksSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howard Wallace Barbee and Bobby Joe Manziel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Gray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Foster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  4. Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API