Foster v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
Appellants were indicted in four counts. The first charged that they “unlawfully, wil-fully, knowingly, feloniously, and with intent to defraud, each did falsely alter a certain obligation of the United States, to-wit, a United States Note in the denomination of Five and no/100ths ($5.00) Dollars, Series of 1928, Serial Number C46904308A, and which said genuine obligation of the United States was altered in this, in that the said Serial Number was changed to read C46904803A, and the Check Letter ‘D’ was altered to read T and the Face Plate number changed from ‘342’ to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Blum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Dell'Aira v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Crouch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
3Cited by18 opinions
- Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Andy Wallace Barnett, Robert Taylor Newman and Jack Coleman Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Arnold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Howard Wallace Barbee and Bobby Joe Manziel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Richey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.