Legal Opinion
Fax Telecommunicaciones v. AT & T
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 30, 1996No. 1:94-cv-05339PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge:
Plaintiff Fax Telecommunicaciones (“Fax”) originally brought this action in state court against defendant AT & T, alleging that AT &. T overbilled it in connection with certain overseas and domestic long-distance telephone services provided by AT & T. Defendant AT & T then removed the action to federal court, claiming federal question jurisdiction under the Federal Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. AT & T now moves for summary judgment dismissing Fax’s claims pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and in favor…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fax Telecommunicaciones Inc. v. At&t, Michael Gilmartin and Richard StottsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- At & T Corp. v. Jmc Telecom, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Ting v. AT & TDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Smith v. SBC Communications Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Mincron SBC Corp. v. Worldcom, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.