Legal Opinion

United Technologies v. Mims

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 12, 1989No. Civ. 6849PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The employee brought suit against his employer for workmen's compensation benefits due to a work-related injury. After anore tenus hearing, the trial court found that the employee had sustained a work-related injury to a scheduled member. However, the trial court concluded that the effect of such injury extended to other parts of his body and produced a greater or more prolonged incapacity than that which naturally resulted from the specific injury and awarded benefits, pursuant to §25-5-57(a)(3)(g), Ala. Code (1975) (1986 Repl.Vol.). The employer appeals. We affirm.

On appeal the employer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bell v. DriskillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haywood v. Russell Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte Dunlop Tire CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. ROBBINS TIRE & RUBBER CO., INC. v. ElliottCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Cagle v. Dunlop Tire Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  5. Whitehead Forest Products v. HugginsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API