United Technologies v. Mims
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The employee brought suit against his employer for workmen's compensation benefits due to a work-related injury. After anore tenus hearing, the trial court found that the employee had sustained a work-related injury to a scheduled member. However, the trial court concluded that the effect of such injury extended to other parts of his body and produced a greater or more prolonged incapacity than that which naturally resulted from the specific injury and awarded benefits, pursuant to §25-5-57(a)(3)(g), Ala. Code (1975) (1986 Repl.Vol.). The employer appeals. We affirm.
On appeal the employer…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bell v. DriskillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
3Cited by9 opinions
- Haywood v. Russell Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Ex Parte Dunlop Tire CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- ROBBINS TIRE & RUBBER CO., INC. v. ElliottCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Cagle v. Dunlop Tire Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Whitehead Forest Products v. HugginsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.