Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

ROBBINS TIRE & RUBBER CO., INC. v. Elliott

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1992No. 2910073PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dan Elliott filed a complaint for workmen's compensation benefits in the Circuit Court of Lauderdale County against Robbins Tire and Rubber Company (Robbins) alleging that he was owed benefits for a work-related injury. Following an oral proceeding, the trial court found Elliott to be totally and permanently disabled. Robbins appeals.

The record reflects that Elliott was a mill operator for Robbins. At the time of the injury he was 60 years old and had worked for Robbins for 31 years. He has a fifth-grade education. His prior work history consists of farm and construction work.

On October 5,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Bell v. DriskillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Gold Kist, Inc. v. CaseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. KimbrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Richardson Homes Corporation v. SheltonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Addison Fabricators, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Ex Parte Dunlop Tire CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. A.M.R. Services v. ButlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Cagle v. Dunlop Tire Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  5. Morrow v. Dunlop Tire CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API