Haywood v. Russell Corp.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Tommie Lee Haywood (employee) filed suit for workmen's compensation benefits because of consecutive injuries to her left hand and arm, her right hand and arm, and her back and neck which she allegedly suffered while employed by Russell Corporation (employer) as a sewing machine operator.
In its order, the trial court noted that the parties stipulated that Alabama's Workmen's Compensation Act applied; that the employee's average weekly earnings were $163.54; and that certain of the employee's medical bills had been paid by the employer, but certain others had not been paid pending the decision…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Bell v. DriskillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Ex Parte DCH Regional Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Patterson v. Clarke County Motors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Etheridge v. YeagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ex Parte MoncriefSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- G. UB. MK. Constructors v. TraffanstedtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Hillery v. MacMillan Bloedel, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- McGhee v. International Paper Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- U.S. Steel Corp. v. McBrayerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.