Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harris

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1983No. 319PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge:

Appellant was convicted of theft by receiving stolen property 1 and unauthorized use of automobile 2 following a non-jury trial before Judge Michael E. Wallace who then proceeded to grant the motion of appellant for a new trial and to deny the motion in arrest of judgment. Appellant brought this appeal from the denial of his motion in arrest of judgment. 3 We affirm the order of the Common Pleas Court.

Appellant contends that he is entitled to be discharged since the Common Pleas Court erred when it granted a Commonwealth petition to extend the time for commencement of trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. EhredtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. AntonuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BullingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. NellomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. CorbinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. LeatherburySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. ByrdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API