Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Byrd

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1984No. 228PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, President Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence for forgery, altered, forged or counterfeit documents and plates and attempted theft by deception. Appellant makes two arguments in support of his contention that his right to a speedy trial was violated. Because we find both arguments meritless, we affirm.

The complaint was filed on September 17, 1980. Therefore, under Rule 1100, the Commonwealth was required to bring appellant to trial by March 16, 1981. However, on August 5, 1981, by an order not challenged here, the time for trial was extended to December 21, 1981, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. EhredtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. CrowleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. AntonuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. NellomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. VeselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. GorhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API