Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Nellom

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 29, 1989No. 3222PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence for rape and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse. Appellant contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in (1) granting the Commonwealth an extension of time under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100, and (2) ruling that appellant’s character witness could be cross-examined as to her knowledge of his prior robbery conviction. 1 For the following reasons, we agree with appellant's second contention and, accordingly, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial.

On March 28, 1987, appellant was arrested for robbery, rape, and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In the Interest of R.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. BowserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. MinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API