McDermott, Will & Emery v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS, J.—
Introduction
May a shareholder sue its corporation’s outside counsel in a derivative action for legal malpractice arising out of counsel’s representation of the corporation, where the corporation refuses a proper demand to commence the action? Under the procedural posture of this case (a denial of a motion for judgment on the pleadings), we are not called upon to address the merits of this lawsuit or whether such a suit would subsequently be dismissed under the business judgment rule. Rather, we are asked to decide whether, assuming all procedural requirements have been met…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Robertson v. Gaston Snow & Ely BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dietz v. Meisenheimer & HerronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Favila v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Virtanen v. O'CONNELLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Titmas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People ex rel. Herrera v. StenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.