Legal Opinion

McDermott, Will & Emery v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 2000No. B137829PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, J.—

Introduction

May a shareholder sue its corporation’s outside counsel in a derivative action for legal malpractice arising out of counsel’s representation of the corporation, where the corporation refuses a proper demand to commence the action? Under the procedural posture of this case (a denial of a motion for judgment on the pleadings), we are not called upon to address the merits of this lawsuit or whether such a suit would subsequently be dismissed under the business judgment rule. Rather, we are asked to decide whether, assuming all procedural requirements have been met…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  3. United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Robertson v. Gaston Snow & Ely BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dietz v. Meisenheimer & HerronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Favila v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Virtanen v. O'CONNELLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Titmas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People ex rel. Herrera v. StenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API