Noyes v. Tootle
Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory
Appeal from the United States Court for the Northern District. William M. Springer, Judge. Action by Tootle, Wheeler & Motter against W. V. Carey and others. Noyes, Norman & Co. and others filed interpleas. Judgment for plaintiffs. Interpleaders appeal.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the United States Court for the Northern District. William M. Springer, Judge. Action by Tootle, Wheeler & Motter against W. V. Carey and others. Noyes, Norman & Co. and others filed interpleas. Judgment for plaintiffs. Interpleaders appeal. On May 24, 1895, the plaintiffs below, appellees here, brought suit against W. V. Carey and Robert B. Croam, doing business under the firm name of W. V. Carey, for $942, on an account for goods, wares, and merchandise, and procured an attachment on the ground that the defendants had sold their property with the fraudulent intent to cheat and…
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
The appellants, in the arrangement of their brief, have not clearly apprehended, or have failed to fully comply with, the requirements of rule 10 of this court. The portion of the rule not complied with is as follows : ‘ ‘2. This brief shall contain, in order here stated. (1) A concise abstract, or statement of the case, presenting succinctly the questions involved, in the manner in which they are raised. (2) A specification of the errors relied upon, in law cases, shall set out separately and particularly each error asserted and intended to be urged. * * * When the error alleged is to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shelley v. BootheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Warner v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Cooper v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Worland v. KimberlinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1846
- Hale v. RawallieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bernert v. BernertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926