Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 2000No. WCB 93-02515; CAA85643; SC S43918PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
In this workers’ compensation case, the issue is whether claimant is entitled to compensation for an injury suffered during a compelled medical examination (CME) under ORS 656.325(l)(a) 1 that her employer requested. The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) upheld employer’s denial of compensation, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc., 143 Or App 59, 923 P2d 668 (1996). For the reasons stated below, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and the order of the Board, and we remand the case to the Board for further proceedings.
The facts in this case are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Phil A. Livesley Co. v. RussOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. SnyderOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Central PointOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Hearthstone Manor v. StuartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Keller v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Legacy Health Systems v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.