Legal Opinion

Wright v. Fardo

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 25, 1979PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, Judge.

Paul Wright, a full-time vocational instructor, contracted for various home improvement jobs in his spare time. Ronald Fardo, a full-time railroad employee, occasionally aided Wright in the performance of electrical work. On January 3, 1977, the Workmen’s Compensation Board awarded Fardo compensation for an injury he sustained while helping Wright wire two rooms. On September 23, 1977, the Campbell Circuit Court affirmed the Board’s finding of coverage. Wright, in this appeal, contends that he and Fardo were not in an employer-employee relationship within the meaning of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Transport Motor Express, Inc. v. FinnKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ratliff v. RedmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  3. Holman Enterprise Tobacco Warehouse v. CarterKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Chambers v. Wooten's IGA FoodlinerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  5. Crush v. KaelinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fawbush v. GwinnKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Huff v. Smith TruckingKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hale v. AluminumKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Treetop Apartments General Partnership v. OysterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Deborah Robbins French v. Rev-A-ShelfKentucky Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API