Legal Opinion

Hale v. Aluminum

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1998No. 98-SC-548-WCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

This matter is before the Court as an appeal by claimant from an opinion of the Court of Appeals reversing the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board). The Board affirmed the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) decision that claimant was totally occupationally disabled and entitled to maximum benefits.

The sole issue on appeal concerns the manner in which claimant’s average weekly wage is to be calculated.

Claimant testified that he had begun doing jobs for Bell Aluminum (Bell) in 1990 and that he worked “on and off for 6-7 years” as a subcontractor installing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Osborne v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  2. Holman Enterprise Tobacco Warehouse v. CarterKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  3. C & D Bulldozing Co. v. BrockKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Wright v. FardoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  5. Fields v. Twin City Drive-InKentucky Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fawbush v. GwinnKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Affordable Aluminum, Inc. v. CoulterKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Deborah Robbins French v. Rev-A-ShelfCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
  4. Deborah Robbins French v. Rev-A-ShelfKentucky Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Fawbush v. GwinnKentucky Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API