Murray v. Murray
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.
— Plaintiff sued for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and personal indignities rendering life burdensome. Defendant denied the allegations of the complaint and, by way of affirmative defense, pleaded condonation. The trial court granted the divorce. Defendant has appealed. Counsel for appellant did not participate in the oral argument before this court.
Appellant first contends that the findings of fact to the effect that appellant had been guilty of cruel treatment to respondent since May, 1949, and that appellant had not given up the habit of excessive use of intoxicating liquor since that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Averbuch v. AverbuchWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Prothero v. ProtheroWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Johnsen v. JohnsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Quient v. QuientWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Cozard v. CozardWashington Supreme Court · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of HadleyWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Stringfellow v. StringfellowWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Littlefield v. LittlefieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Rentel v. RentelWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Potter v. PotterWashington Supreme Court · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.