Legal Opinion

Rentel v. Rentel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1951No. 31734PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This action was originally instituted by respondent in May, 1949, to obtain a divorce from appellant, custody of the two minor children, and a division of property. Later, the action was dismissed, the parties making an effort to become reconciled and resume their marital status. They made a trip to California. Respondent became aggrieved over the conduct of appellant towards her. The present action was commenced December 6, 1949.

The appellant and respondent were married in June, 1939. At that time he was of the age of forty years and she was twenty-three. He followed the business of general…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murray v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cozard v. CozardWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Denison v. DenisonWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Rogers v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schantz v. SchantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Stringfellow v. StringfellowWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Callan v. CallanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. In Re the Marriage of NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API