Legal Opinion

Potter v. Potter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1955No. 32978PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from the decree entered in this divorce action.

While not complaining of the decretal provision granting respondent a divorce, appellant contends that the trial court erred in not also granting her a divorce. If this was error, it was not prejudicial. Smith v. Smith, 45 Wn. (2d) 672, 277 P. (2d) 339.

Appellant asserts that the trial court erred with respect to the distribution of property. Under the decree, all of the property was awarded to respondent, subject to a lien in the amount of twenty-five hundred dollars, in favor of appellant, payable fifty dollars a month.

Responden…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Murray v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Smith v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Curtis v. CurtisWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Hansen v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re the Marriage of HadleyWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In re the Marriage of PossingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Chan v. SmiderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. Bjorneby v. BjornebyWashington Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API