Bickerdike v. State
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated and referred to in the opinion of the court. George E. Bates, W. C. Van Fleet, and Edward F. Treadwell, for Appellant. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, George A. Sturtevant, Deputy Attorney-General, and Devlin & Devlin, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This action was brought under the provisions of the act of March 23, 1901, authorizing suits against the state on claims arising under the Coyote Bounty Act of 1891 (Stats. 1901, p. 646), and is the same action involved in the appeal in Bickerdike v. State of California, heretofore decided (ante, p. 681), to which reference is made for the general facts of the case. That was an appeal by the state from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff as to most of the eight hundred and ninety-two counts of the complaint, and from an order denying a new trial in regard thereto. As to some of the counts,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cooper v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Syme v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Snyder v. United Properties Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Pearson v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- W. P. Herbert Co. v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.