Parsons v. Kimmel
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Replevin by Romeyn C. Parsons against Bert Kimmel for the possession of a cow. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
On June 11, 1915, plaintiff sold to defendant an automobile for $150, taking in part payment thereof a heifer or cow at an agreed price of $75. At the time of the transaction defendant executed to plaintiff a bill of sale for the animal in question. On the next day, plaintiff resold the cow to defendant on a title-retaining contract. Defendant neglected or refused to pay for the cow according to thé terms of the contract, whereupon plaintiff repossessed himself of the animal under a writ of replevin issued November 8, 1917. The animal in question had been given to defendant and his wife…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kindy v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. CullatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Holman v. GilletteMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schaupeter v. SchaupeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1947