Legal Opinion

Holman v. Gillette

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1872PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Kent Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Ohristiancy, Oh. J.

The plaintiff in this case was a married woman, and brought her action of replevin to recover a cow sold by her husband to the defendant, the cow being exempt by law from a sale on execution. The only question necessary to the decision of the case is, whether the husband could make a valid sale of the property, with the verbal, hut without the written, assent of the wife to the sale.

The only law under which she could possibly claim to maintain the action — there being no other alluding in any way to the subject — is the third section of the act of February 13, 1855, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dann v. CudneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beach v. FireovidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Parsons v. KimmelMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API