Turner v. Thomas
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceJustice Ervin
Although I concur in the Court’s decision with respect to plaintiff’s intentional infliction of emotional distress claim and in the Court’s determination that plaintiff has failed to sufficiently state a malicious prosecution claim in his complaint, I am unable to agree with the logic that the Court has employed in upholding the dismissal of plaintiff’s malicious *430prosecution claim. As a result, I concur in the Court’s opinion, in part, and concur in the result reached by the Court, in part.
In determining that plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a malicious prosecution claim, the Court begins…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1996
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.