Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert H. Schmidt and Lawrence B. Schmidt
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 1, 1995No. 19-2904PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
The defendants, Robert H. Schmidt and Lawrence B. Schmidt, were charged in a four-count information with violations of the Clean Water Act.1 See 33 U.S.C. §§ 1317(d), 1319(c) and 1319(e)(4). The defendants were also charged with intentional storage of hazardous wastes without a permit in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 6928(d)(2). Thereafter, on March 5, 1993, the defendants, represented by counsel, pled guilty to the charges in the information (Robert pled guilty to Counts I, II, and III while Lawrence pled guilty to Counts III and IV). Included in each of the defendants’…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Town of Newton v. RumerySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. James BushertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Herbert John MarinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. TeeterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Frank E. ReadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Donald BehrmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Dennis L. WengerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Valerie FloresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.