Legal Opinion
United States v. Valerie Flores
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 3, 2019No. 18-3249PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
St. Eve, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, Valerie Flores challenges one condition of her supervised release as unconstitutionally vague. She admits that she did not raise the challenge in the district court, but she asks that we review it for plain error. The first step in plain-error review, as the Supreme Court has repeatedly said, is to ask whether the defendant intentionally relinquished the challenge she now presents. See Rosales-Mireles v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 138 S. Ct. 1897 , 1904-05, 201 L.Ed.2d 376 (2018) ; Molina-Martinez v. United States , --- U.S. ----, 136 S. Ct. 1338 ,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Scott Hildreth v. Kim ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Reynold De La TorreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Michael ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Arthur FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Tony Love v. Frank VanihelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.